🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on growing your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment recently after viral posts suggested that switching their gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their professional summaries to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system favors male users who use professional networking terminology.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which posts are shown to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after seven days, saying "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some testers encountered favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."