🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.